AI & BI use case · Business Intelligence

KPI Framework & Definitions

One binding definition per metric, instead of five versions of 'revenue'.

What it's about

Together with the business departments, we develop a company-wide KPI framework with clear, documented definitions. Every metric gets an owner, a formula and a source.

  • A shared understanding of numbers across the company.
  • Less time lost to discussions about definitions.
  • Faster onboarding of new employees in reporting.
Business case & ROI
1 Definition

per metric instead of multiple versions

−50 %

arguments over 'the right' number

x 4

faster onboarding of new employees

100 %

core metrics documented

The benefit mainly shows up as avoided mismanagement from conflicting metrics.

How we do it
  1. 01

    Metric inventory

    We collect all metrics and variants currently circulating in the company.

  2. 02

    Prioritization

    Together with departments, the most important core metrics are defined.

  3. 03

    Definition workshops

    Formula, data source and owner are bindingly clarified per metric.

  4. 04

    Documentation in catalog

    All definitions are stored in a searchable metrics catalog.

  5. 05

    Anchoring in reporting

    Existing reports are gradually switched to the new definitions.

5

Steps

6

Data sources

4

Stakeholders

From first data access to production – every step delivers a tangible interim result.

Data typically needed

Existing reports

All currently used Excel and BI reports as a starting point.

System documentation

Field descriptions from ERP, CRM and other source systems.

Department interviews

Departmental knowledge about existing calculation logic.

Data quality reports

Known data issues that affect metric calculation.

Industry benchmarks

External standard definitions for orientation.

Glossaries

Existing term definitions from controlling and departments.

Stakeholders
  • Controlling

    Gets a binding reference for all financial metrics.

  • Business departments

    Know exactly which logic a given metric refers to.

  • IT

    Builds reports on a clear specification instead of assumptions.

  • Executive management

    Can reliably compare departments and time periods.

Typical business value
01

A shared understanding of numbers across the company.

02

Less time lost to discussions about definitions.

03

Faster onboarding of new employees in reporting.

04

Better comparability between departments and plants.

05

A more stable foundation for automation and self-service.

The data platform advantage

With a solid data foundation this use case gets faster, cheaper and far more stable.

A central metrics catalog makes definitions discoverable for everyone.

Linking to the data model prevents definition drift.

Versioning documents changes to metrics traceably.

Governance processes secure long-term consistency.

Build a data platform
Synergies & positive side effects

Management cockpit

Provides the binding definitions for all cockpit metrics.

Self-service BI

Gives departments a reliable framework for their own analyses.

Reporting automation

Automated reports draw on the same validated definitions.